I received the following anonymous comment and am printing it in its entirety. Although it supports my position, I am printing it because it raises a number of issues concerning the performance of the Select Board.
Thanks for your article. Overall, the Board of Selectmen needs an attitude adjustment. I’ve been observing these meetings for some time and I’m increasingly dismayed at the negative “can’t do” attitude, the lack of respect for the citizens of Ashland and the lack of professionalism. If that seems harsh, let me cite a few examples.
1. Can’t do Attitude (and negativity).
a. A group of concerned citizens presented their research on the benefits of moving the bandstand to a location where it might be used and appreciated, rather than sitting unused and unloved in a gravel section of the ball field next to a porta-potty. The immediate reaction was “can’t do” - might cost too much, liability issues, parking problems, police patrolling problems and of course, what if……? One citizen suggested that before they reject the notion altogether (since many expressed support for the idea), perhaps they should investigate the issues before saying no. That was greeted with silence.
b. A citizen raised a concern that the newly reinstalled ramp at the beach had some potential safety issues regarding a gap through which small children might fall. Again, negative reaction. The simple response should have been to request Mark Ober to check it out. (More about this below.)
c. An individual from the Ashland Area Recreation Association (AARA) presented their ideas on building a concession stand/public restroom facility in the ball field. She began her presentation with the statement that this would be of no cost to the town, had the potential to generate income, were looking into applying for grants and only wanted the Board’s approval to continue their efforts. Again, the immediate reaction was NO – what if the roof needs replacing in 8 years, what if it needs repairs, who will monitor use, three bathrooms are too much, it sits on a right-of-way location and what if the property is sold in 10 years and the new owners…… While some concerns/questions are valid and should be answered, who would want to pursue the ideas when the board already shot it down? It took a simple suggestion from our newly appointed Director of Pubic Works to move the backstop and thus create a new possibility for location to move beyond the negativity.
d. They can’t even figure out how to install an historic bell in a location for all to enjoy.
2. Lack of respect for the Citizens of Ashland.
a. At this week’s meeting, Mr. Toth asked a question about the process for appointing the new “Director of Public Works.” He was treated with contempt and accused of “wasting” town money (as discussed in this blog article) since they felt the need to consult an attorney based on an earlier blog article. How about “Thanks for your question Mr. Toth. We have looked into it and based on our research, we believe… Did that address your issue?”
b. Sandra Coleman raised a question about the process for selecting Glenn Dion to fill the vacancy. The response to her question was, in my opinion, hostile and defensive. She had been treated worse in an earlier meeting when Janette Stewart cut off discussion about issues raised by Sandra, citing her authority to do so as Chair.
c. Item b above – the woman who raised the issue of the ramp - was first questioned as to her residency. Then was told that parents are responsible for watching their kids and it’s not the town’s problem. How about “Thanks for raising this concern. We will certainly look into it. The safety of our residents is of utmost concern.”
d. Meetings are now being held in the school library. While this is better for acoustics (no need for microphones), it is standing room only, which discourages attendance (I can only assume this is the plan).
e. Work sessions are now being held at 9 in the morning in the town hall conference room, with little or no room for observers (the meeting is open to the public). The time and location make it difficult or impossible for public attendance. Sends a loud and clear message that we are not welcome.
3. Lack of professionalism: The issues cited in the above examples speak clearly to this. In addition,
a. When questioned, they frequently defer to Paul Branscombe, saying, for example, “it was Paul’s suggestion.” I would like to remind the Board that Paul Branscombe is the Town Administrator and answers to them, not the reverse. Following his suggestions does not absolve them of responsibility.
b. I was also disappointed that the Selectmen could not find time to attend the Charette (only Dan Golden sent his apologies in advance). This event brought a little energy in the town and was well attended. It’s too bad they could not hear concerns and creative ideas and from the citizens they supposedly represent.
c. They also did not participate in the July 4th parade or the Table Top exercise. What does this say about their interest in the town?
The Board of Selectmen was elected by the citizens of the town to represent our best interests. They are answerable to the town in everything they do. I do not expect to agree with everything they do. However, I do expect that I, all of us, will be listened to with courtesy, respect and an open mind. I also expect – demand – transparency in our town government. If the present behavior and attitudes do not change, I for one, will be not only be casting my vote for someone else, I will be actively campaigning for better-qualified candidates.
No comments:
Post a Comment